From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flowers v. Franklin

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Aug 31, 2006
No. CIV-05-837-C (W.D. Okla. Aug. 31, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV-05-837-C.

August 31, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Bana Roberts, consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Roberts entered a Report and Recommendation on July 11, 2006, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de novo.

The facts and law are accurately set out in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and there is no purpose to be served in repeating them yet again. In his objection, Petitioner merely restates the conclusions and legal argument originally asserted, and raises no issue not fully and accurately addressed and rejected by the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons announced therein, DENIES this Petition for Habeas Corpus relief. A judgment will enter accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Flowers v. Franklin

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Aug 31, 2006
No. CIV-05-837-C (W.D. Okla. Aug. 31, 2006)
Case details for

Flowers v. Franklin

Case Details

Full title:HENRY C. FLOWERS, JR., Petitioner v. ERIC FRANKLIN, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Aug 31, 2006

Citations

No. CIV-05-837-C (W.D. Okla. Aug. 31, 2006)