From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flowers v. Evans

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 6, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2801 JAM JFM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2801 JAM JFM P.

October 6, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On May 29, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 29, 2008, are adopted in full;

2. Respondents' March 7, 2008 motion to dismiss is granted; and

3. This action is dismissed as barred by the statute of limitations.


Summaries of

Flowers v. Evans

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 6, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2801 JAM JFM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2008)
Case details for

Flowers v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN S. FLOWERS, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL EVANS, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 6, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2801 JAM JFM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2008)