From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flowers v. Baca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 21, 2014
3:14-cv-366-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Oct. 21, 2014)

Opinion

3:14-cv-366-RCJ-WGC

10-21-2014

JOHN FLOWERS, Plaintiff, v. ISIDRO BACA et al., Defendants.


ORDER

I. DISCUSSION

On September 29, 2014, this Court issued a screening order granting Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis but dismissed Plaintiff's complaint in its entirety. (ECF No. 5 at 8). This Court did not indicate whether an appeal would be taken "in good faith" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). On October 8, 2014, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal. (ECF No. 12). That same day, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order directing this Court to indicate whether Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should continue for the appeal. (ECF No. 13).

The Court now finds the appeal would be taken "in good faith" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the appeal would be taken "in good faith" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

Dated: This 21st day of October, 2014.

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Flowers v. Baca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 21, 2014
3:14-cv-366-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Oct. 21, 2014)
Case details for

Flowers v. Baca

Case Details

Full title:JOHN FLOWERS, Plaintiff, v. ISIDRO BACA et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 21, 2014

Citations

3:14-cv-366-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Oct. 21, 2014)