From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flournoy v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 26, 2012
90 So. 3d 271 (Fla. 2012)

Opinion

No. SC12–138.

2012-04-26

Larvictor FLOURNOY, Petitioner(s) v. Kenneth S. TUCKER, etc., Respondent(s).


To the extent the petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus, because the Court has determined that relief is not authorized, this case is hereby dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004). To the extent the petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition, relief is hereby denied because the petitioner has failed to demonstrate that a lower court is attempting to act in excess of its jurisdiction. See Mandico v. Taos Constr., Inc., 605 So.2d 850 (Fla.1992); English v. McCrary, 348 So.2d 293 (Fla.1977). Any motions or other requests for relief are also denied.

LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Flournoy v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 26, 2012
90 So. 3d 271 (Fla. 2012)
Case details for

Flournoy v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:Larvictor FLOURNOY, Petitioner(s) v. Kenneth S. TUCKER, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Apr 26, 2012

Citations

90 So. 3d 271 (Fla. 2012)