From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Floridstone v. Fitzpatrick

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 28, 1992
606 So. 2d 513 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 92-0418.

October 28, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County; Gary L. Vonhof, Judge.

Cheryl R. Eisen, Boca Raton, for appellant.

R. Brady Osborne, Jr. and Roderick C. McDonald, Osborne, Hankins, McLaren Redgrave, Boca Raton, for appellee.


We reject Floridstone's position that the settlement is voidable because it did not receive sufficient notice of the hearing where the trial court originally approved the settlement distributions. See § 733.610, Fla. Stat. (1991). Floridstone was present at the properly noticed hearing on the Personal Representative's Petition for Discharge, wherein the court expressly approved the settlement. Floridstone failed to present evidence at that hearing to show that the transaction should be voided.

Affirmed.

DELL and POLEN, JJ., and SEIDLIN, LARRY, Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Floridstone v. Fitzpatrick

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 28, 1992
606 So. 2d 513 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Floridstone v. Fitzpatrick

Case Details

Full title:FLORIDSTONE, N.V., A NETHERLANDS ANTILLES CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 28, 1992

Citations

606 So. 2d 513 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)