Opinion
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI MDL No. 1827
10-07-2011
In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates To: Case No. 2010-CV-3517 SI STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Plaintiff, v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Defendants.
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP JOHN M. GRENFELL (CA Bar No. 88500) JACOB R. SORENSEN (CA Bar No. 209134) FUSAE NARA ( pro hac vice ) ANDREW D. LANPHERE (CA Bar No. 191479) Attorneys for Defendants SHARP CORPORATION and SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION R. Scott Palmer Lizabeth A. Brady Nicholas J. Weilhammer ( pro hac vice ) Office of the Attorney General
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
JOHN M. GRENFELL (CA Bar No. 88500)
JACOB R. SORENSEN (CA Bar No. 209134)
FUSAE NARA (pro hac vice)
ANDREW D. LANPHERE (CA Bar No. 191479)
Attorneys for Defendants
SHARP CORPORATION and
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING SHARP'S TIME TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT
WHEREAS plaintiff State of Florida filed an Amended Complaint in the above-captioned case against Defendants AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Innolux Corp., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Hannstar Display Corporation, Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Mobile Display Technology Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. on April 13, 2011, Dkt. no. 2652;
WHEREAS Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation (together, "Sharp"), jointly with other defendants in this action, filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint on May 20, 2011;
WHEREAS the Court denied defendants' joint motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint on September 15, 2011;
WHEREAS Sharp desires a reasonable amount of time to answer the Amended Complaint; and
WHEREAS the requested time modification will not affect any other deadline in this case.
THEREFORE, the State of Florida and Sharp hereby agree that Sharp's deadline to answer to the Amended Complaint shall be November 7, 2011.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
R. Scott Palmer
Lizabeth A. Brady
Nicholas J. Weilhammer (pro hac vice)
Office of the Attorney General
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
JOHN M. GRENFELL
JACOB R. SORENSEN
FUSAE NARA
ANDREW D. LANPHERE
John M. Grenfell
Attorneys for Defendants SHARP CORPORATION and SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that the concurrence of the other signatory hereto has been obtained.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Honorable Susan Illston