From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. Vick

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 15, 1964
162 So. 2d 314 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Opinion

No. 63-226.

February 25, 1964. Rehearing Denied April 15, 1964.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Ray Pearson, Judge.

Bolles, Prunty, Martin Goodwin and Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Miami, for appellant.

Frates, Fay Floyd, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.


The appellant railway company, the defendant below, has appealed from an adverse judgment based on a jury verdict in a case arising out of a railroad crossing collision between a train and an automobile. Appellant states and argues three points dealing with admission of evidence, one of which also concerns comments of counsel in argument to the jury. On consideration thereof in the light of the briefs and record we conclude that the case was fully and fairly tried, and no reversible error has been made to appear.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. Vick

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 15, 1964
162 So. 2d 314 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
Case details for

Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. Vick

Case Details

Full title:FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. MARY JO…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 15, 1964

Citations

162 So. 2d 314 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Citing Cases

Alamo Iron Works v. Prado

Statutes relating to appeals are always liberally construed; and this court has heretofore followed that rule…