From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FLORIDA BAR v. MIRK

Supreme Court of Florida
May 14, 2007
958 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 2007)

Opinion

No. SC07-394.

May 14, 2007.

Lower Tribunal No. 2007-11,035(13B)(OSC).


This is before the Court on The Florida Bar's Petition for Contempt and Order to Show Cause.

The Court having issued its Order to Show Cause to respondent and responses having been filed to said Order to Show Cause,

IT IS ORDERED that respondent is held in contempt of this Court. See R. Regulating Fla. Bar 5-1.2(g)(1). As a sanction, respondent is suspended from the practice of law effective thirty days from the date of this order so that respondent can close out his practice and protect the interests of existing clients. Respondent shall remain suspended until he has certified compliance with the Subpoena Duces Tecum of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Grievance Committee "B" dated December 4, 2006. See R. Regulating Fla. Bar 5-1.2(g)(3). If respondent notifies this Court in writing that he is no longer practicing and does not need the thirty days to protect existing clients, this Court will enter an order making the suspension effective immediately. Respondent shall accept no new business from the date this order is filed until he is reinstated.

Not final until time expires to file motion for rehearing, and if filed, determined. The filing of a motion for rehearing shall not alter the effective date of this suspension.

LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

FLORIDA BAR v. MIRK

Supreme Court of Florida
May 14, 2007
958 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 2007)
Case details for

FLORIDA BAR v. MIRK

Case Details

Full title:THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant(s) v. R. PATRICK MIRK, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 14, 2007

Citations

958 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 2007)

Citing Cases

Florida Bar v. Mirk

Ultimately, we determined that Mirk did not show cause and, on May 14, 2007, we entered an order suspending…