From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Florida Bar v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 22, 1971
247 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 1971)

Opinion

No. 40563.

April 22, 1971.

Case of original jurisdiction — Complaint from The Florida Bar.

Patrick A. Podsaid, Coral Gables, and Arnold Nevins, Miami Beach, for The Florida Bar, complainant.

Harold Peter Barkas, Miami, for respondent.


The referee on February 18, 1971, filed his report recommending certain disciplinary actions against the respondent, Edward B. Johnson, Jr., a member of The Florida Bar.

The accused lawyer has not sought review as permitted by Rule 11.09(3) of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 32 F.S.A. The recommendation of the referee is, therefore, approved and accordingly respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded and directed to show, instanter, to the satisfaction of the Bar that he has instituted an accounting system which will permit complete control of monies entrusted to him. Respondent is further ordered to pay the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $640.50.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, A.C.J., and CARLTON, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Florida Bar v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 22, 1971
247 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 1971)
Case details for

Florida Bar v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT, v. EDWARD B. JOHNSON, JR., RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Apr 22, 1971

Citations

247 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 1971)