From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. U.S. Attorney Gen.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Oct 29, 2015
Case No. 15-MC-124-JTM (D. Kan. Oct. 29, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 15-MC-124-JTM

10-29-2015

Eric Flores, Plaintiff, v. United States Attorney General, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

By order dated April 16, 2013, the court in Flores v. United States Attorney General, No. 13-1137 (Dkt. 5), directed that a district judge will review any future submissions by plaintiff Eric Flores and determine whether they would be filed. Approximately two years later, Flores attempted file to his claims of satellite-based genetic manipulation, by submitting a "Petition to Challenge the Constitutionality of the First Amendment." The court reviewed the pleadings, found they were frivolous within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and dismissed the petition. Flores v. United States Attorney General, No. 15-107 (April 27, 2015) (Dkt. 1).

Flores has now attempted to renew his claims by presenting substantially similar arguments through a mailing to the court. Consistent with the court's determination in April, the court finds that the pleadings are frivolous and should not be filed, that the request to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and that the filing restrictions from the first action shall remain in place.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 29th day of October, 2015.

s/ J. Thomas Marten

J. THOMAS MARTEN, JUDGE


Summaries of

Flores v. U.S. Attorney Gen.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Oct 29, 2015
Case No. 15-MC-124-JTM (D. Kan. Oct. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Flores v. U.S. Attorney Gen.

Case Details

Full title:Eric Flores, Plaintiff, v. United States Attorney General, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Oct 29, 2015

Citations

Case No. 15-MC-124-JTM (D. Kan. Oct. 29, 2015)