From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 13, 2021
2:03-CR-80359-TGB-RSW-10 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 13, 2021)

Opinion

2:03-CR-80359-TGB-RSW-10

01-13-2021

ALBERTO FLORES, a.k.a. RAMIRO ORDAZ MELGOZA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Opinion and Order issued on this date,

The motion to modify or reduce sentence is DENIED (ECF No. 263), motion to appoint counsel is DENIED (ECF No. 262), and motion for entry of default judgment is DENIED AS MOOT (ECF No. 272). It is FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED and permission to appeal in forma pauperis is GRANTED.

Dated at Detroit, Michigan: January 13, 2021

KINIKIA ESSIX

CLERK OF THE COURT

s/A. Chubb

Case Manager and Deputy

Clerk APPROVED:
s/Terrence G. Berg
TERRENCE G. BERG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Flores v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 13, 2021
2:03-CR-80359-TGB-RSW-10 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Flores v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ALBERTO FLORES, a.k.a. RAMIRO ORDAZ MELGOZA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 13, 2021

Citations

2:03-CR-80359-TGB-RSW-10 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 13, 2021)