From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. Sullivan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 15, 2020
Case No. ED CV 17-434 VBF (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. ED CV 17-434 VBF (MRW)

07-15-2020

JESSIE JAMES FLORES, Petitioner, v. W.J. SULLIVAN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. DATE: July 15, 2020

/s/_________

HON. VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Flores v. Sullivan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 15, 2020
Case No. ED CV 17-434 VBF (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2020)
Case details for

Flores v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:JESSIE JAMES FLORES, Petitioner, v. W.J. SULLIVAN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 15, 2020

Citations

Case No. ED CV 17-434 VBF (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2020)