Flores v. Or. Dep't of Corr.

3 Citing cases

  1. Coyle v. Brown

    6:21-cv-00149-SB (D. Or. Aug. 27, 2024)

    The Court therefore recommends that the district judge grant Defendants' motion to dismiss Coyle's claims against ODOC and SCI Medical Department with prejudice. See Flores v. Or. Dep't of Corr., No. 2:22-cv-01399-SB, 2023 WL 7280420, at *3, *7 (D. Or. Nov. 3, 2023) (dismissing the plaintiff's Section 1983 claims against ODOC pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment without leave to amend); Harpole v. Boston, No. 2:22-cv-01033-HZ, 2023 WL 5806250, at *4 n.3 (D. Or. Sept. 4, 2023) (concluding that “[a]s an arm of the state, ODOC is immune from suit in federal court for claims brought under state law”) (citation omitted).

  2. Jackson v. Surber

    2:22-cv-01832-SB (D. Or. Aug. 13, 2024)

    See Flores v. Or. Dep't of Corr., No. 2:22-cv-01399-SB, 2023 WL 7280420, at *5 n.2 (D. Or. Nov. 3, 2023) (dismissing the AIC plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment conditions of confinement claim).

  3. Flores v. Brown

    3:23-cv-00462-SB (D. Or. May. 21, 2024)

    The Court therefore recommends that the district judge grant the State Defendants' motion to dismiss Flores' claims against ODOC without leave to amend. See Flores v. Or. Dep't of Corr., No. 2:22-cv-01399-SB, 2023 WL 7280420, at *3 (D. Or. Nov. 3, 2023) (dismissing Flores' claims against ODOC pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment without leave to amend); Harpole v. Boston, No. 2:22-cv-01033-HZ, 2023 WL 5806250, at *4 n.3 (D. Or. Sept. 4, 2023) (concluding that “[a]s an arm of the state, ODOC is immune from suit in federal court for claims brought under state law”) (citation omitted)