Flores v. Office Depot

3 Citing cases

  1. In re T.H.

    No. 02-19-00300-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 1, 2020)   Cited 2 times

    See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9. But a pro se litigant is held to the same standards as a licensed attorney and must comply with applicable laws and procedural rules. Flores v. Office Depot, Inc., No. 02-10-00311-CV, 2011 WL 2611140, at *2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth June 30, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.). Father's three appellate complaints, as we understand them, are that the trial court erred by (1) denying his request for a court-appointed attorney, (2) denying his bench-warrant motion, and (3) denying his jury-trial request.

  2. Thomas v. Pugliese

    No. 02-18-00064-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 11, 2019)   Cited 2 times

    See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9. But a pro se litigant is held to the same standards as a licensed attorney and must comply with applicable laws and procedural rules. Flores v. Office Depot, Inc., No. 02-10-00311-CV, 2011 WL 2611140, at *2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth June 30, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.); Strange v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 126 S.W.3d 676, 677 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2004, pet. denied). On appeal, a pro se appellant must properly present her case. Flores, 2011 WL 2611140, at *2; Strange, 126 S.W.3d at 678.

  3. Baish v. Allen

    No. 02-17-00146-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 21, 2019)   Cited 5 times

    Pro se litigants are held to the same standards as licensed attorneys and must comply with applicable laws and procedural rules. Strange v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 126 S.W.3d 676, 677 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2004, pet. denied); Flores v. Office Depot, Inc., No. 02-10-00311-CV, 2011 WL 2611140, at *2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth June 30, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.). On appeal, they must properly present their cases.