From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
May 9, 2013
No. C-12-686 MEJ (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)

Opinion

No. C-12-686 MEJ

05-09-2013

JULIO FLORES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL RAILROARD PASSENGER CORP. dba AMTRAK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT

REQUESTS

The Court is in receipt of the parties' request for a case management conference. Upon review of the parties' request, the Court finds a conference unnecessary and ORDERS as follows: 1) To the extent that the parties all seek to extend case management deadlines (including deposing experts), they shall file a stipulation and proposed order; 2) To the extent that the parties are unable to reach an agreement regarding any deadlines (including rebuttal expert reports), they shall comply with the undersigned's discovery standing order; 3) To the extent that the parties object to the content of expert reports, such objections are properly addressed through rebuttal expert reports, objections filed as part of or in opposition to a summary judgment motion, or in motions in limine; and 4) Any party submitting the train's locomotive video (or any other video) shall manually file it in compliance with Civil Local 5-1(f).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

Maria-Elena James

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Flores v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
May 9, 2013
No. C-12-686 MEJ (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Flores v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JULIO FLORES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL RAILROARD PASSENGER CORP…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California

Date published: May 9, 2013

Citations

No. C-12-686 MEJ (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)