Flores v. McDaniel

Full title: SAMUEL FLORES, Plaintiff, v. E.K. McDANIEL, Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 22, 2011

3:11-CV-0236-HDM (VPC) (D. Nev. Aug. 22, 2011)

Opinion

3:11-CV-0236-HDM (VPC)

08-22-2011

SAMUEL FLORES, Plaintiff, v. E.K. McDANIEL, Defendant.

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING

VALERIE P. COOKE

MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (#15) is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff's requests for discovery (#s 15 & 16) are DENIED. Plaintiff shall have one final extension of time to Friday, September 9, 2011 to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. No further extensions of time shall be granted.

If plaintiff fails to timely file an opposition, defendants' motion will be submitted to the court as an unopposed motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: __________________

Deputy Clerk