From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. Mark

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Mar 1, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 65931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

Motion No: 2011-10805 M133908 Docket No. V-862-08/10-11 E, G, I, J, K V-863-08/11C V-864-08/10A, B, E, G, I, J O-1034-10; V-862-08/10A O-596-11

03-01-2012

In the Matter of Ervin Flores, respondent, v. Niomee Sonja Mark, appellant. (Matter No. 1) In the Matter of Niomee Sonja Mark, appellant, v. Ervin Flores, respondent. (Matter No. 2)


, J.P.

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS

LEONARD B. AUSTIN

ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeal by Niomee Sonja Mark from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (IDV Part), dated November 14, 2011. By order to show cause dated January 26, 2012, the parties or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal in the above-entitled proceedings for failure to comply with a scheduling order dated December 6, 2011, issued pursuant to § 670.4(a)(2) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a][2]). Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel.

Now, upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, and upon the papers filed in support of the appellant's motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied; and it is further

ORDERED that the appellant's motion is granted, and the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal:

Mark Diamond, Esq.
Yorkville Station
and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the child, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act § 1116); and it is further,

ORDERED that the stenographer(s) and/or the transcription service(s) is/are required promptly to make and certify two transcripts of the proceedings, if any, except for those minutes previously transcribed and certified (22 NYCRR 671.9); in the case of stenographers, both transcripts shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court, and the clerk of the Family Court shall furnish one of such certified transcripts to the appellant's counsel, without charge; in the case of transcription services, one transcript shall be filed with the clerk of the Family Court and one transcript shall be delivered to the assigned counsel. Assigned counsel is directed to provide copies of said transcripts to all of the other parties to the appeal, including the attorney for the child, if any, when counsel serves the appellant's brief upon those parties; and it is further,

ORDERED that the assigned counsel shall prosecute the appeal expeditiously in accordance with any scheduling order or orders issued pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]); and it is further,

ORDERED that assigned counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken; and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to § 670.4(a) of the rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 670.4[a]), within 30 days after the date of this scheduling order, the assigned counsel shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:

(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of any Family Court proceeding to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcripts have been received, and indicating the date received; or
(3) if the transcripts have not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that this decision and order on motion, has been served upon the clerk of the court from which the appeal is taken, the date thereof, and the date by which the transcripts are expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,

ORDERED that if none of the above actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above, has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.

DICKERSON, J.P., CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

The Case Manager assigned to this case is Mr. Rose. Please contact him at 718-722-6487 with any questions.


Summaries of

Flores v. Mark

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Mar 1, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 65931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Flores v. Mark

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Ervin Flores, respondent, v. Niomee Sonja Mark…

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Date published: Mar 1, 2012

Citations

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 65931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)