From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 29, 2017
Case No. EDCV 16-1945-DMG (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 16-1945-DMG (JEM)

12-29-2017

ALVARO A. FLORES, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: December 29, 2017

/s/_________

DOLLY M. GEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Flores v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 29, 2017
Case No. EDCV 16-1945-DMG (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Flores v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:ALVARO A. FLORES, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 29, 2017

Citations

Case No. EDCV 16-1945-DMG (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2017)