Opinion
2757.
Decided January 29, 2004.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered April 18, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment on its third-party action for indemnification and granted the cross motion to dismiss the third-party complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Jennifer B. Ettenger, for Plaintiff.
Steven DiSiervi, for Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant.
Before: Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Ellerin, Gonzalez, JJ.
Since the damage plaintiff suffered to his right eye is not a "grave injury" under Workers' Compensation Law § 11 ( see Ibarra v. Equip. Control, 268 A.D.2d 13, 18), defendant is unable to obtain indemnification from plaintiff's employer unless, prior to the accident, the parties entered into a written contract whereby the employer expressly agreed to contribute to or indemnify the claimant ( cf. Acosta v. Green Mgt. Corp., 267 A.D.2d 67). It is undisputed that the contract defendant offered in support of its demand for indemnification was never signed. A contract that was not actually entered into before the occurrence of an accident is not available for indemnification against the employer, notwithstanding the latter's supervision, direction and control of the worksite and its general compliance with the terms of the unexecuted contract ( see Burke v. Fisher Sixth Ave. Co., 287 A.D.2d 410; Beckford v. City of New York, 261 A.D.2d 158).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.