From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. Juvenille Substance Abuse Crisis Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
May 21, 2015
Civ. No. 14-1120 KK/SCY (D.N.M. May. 21, 2015)

Opinion

Civ. No. 14-1120 KK/SCY

05-21-2015

TOMMY J. FLORES, Plaintiff, v. JUVENILLE SUBSTANCE ABUSE CRISIS CENTER, et al., Defendants.


PROPOSED FINDING AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

THIS MATTER is before me on review of the record and on Plaintiff's May 18, 2015 letter to the Court (Doc. 8). Plaintiff filed the present action in this Court on December 10, 2014. Doc. 1. Because Plaintiff failed to serve Defendants within 120 days of filing, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), on April 17, 2015, the Court entered an order to show cause extending the deadline to serve Defendants until May 18, 2015. Doc. 7. The Court warned Plaintiff that failure to serve Defendants by May 18, 2015 or failure to file a motion by this date requesting additional time to effect service would result in the dismissal of his claims without prejudice. Id. In response to this order, Plaintiff filed a letter with the Court stating "at this point in time I do not have the resources or fund to continue with this action . . . therefore I respectfully ask that my action filed December 10, 2014 be held at this point in time." Doc. 8. It is unclear to the Court whether Plaintiff is asking for a dismissal of his claims without prejudice or an indefinite stay of the case. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), however, precludes the entry of an indefinite stay. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) ("[i]f a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court--on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff--must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.") (emphasis added). It is, therefore, my recommendation that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's claims without prejudice under Rule 4(m).

/s/_________

HONORABLE STEVEN C. YARBROUGH

United States Magistrate Judge

THE PARTIES ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT WITHIN 14 DAYS OF SERVICE of a copy of these Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition they may file written objections with the Clerk of the District Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party must file any objections with the Clerk of the District Court within the fourteen-day period if that party wants to have appellate review of the proposed findings and recommended disposition. If no objections are filed, no appellate review will be allowed.


Summaries of

Flores v. Juvenille Substance Abuse Crisis Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
May 21, 2015
Civ. No. 14-1120 KK/SCY (D.N.M. May. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Flores v. Juvenille Substance Abuse Crisis Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:TOMMY J. FLORES, Plaintiff, v. JUVENILLE SUBSTANCE ABUSE CRISIS CENTER, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: May 21, 2015

Citations

Civ. No. 14-1120 KK/SCY (D.N.M. May. 21, 2015)