From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. Goldsmith

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Texarkana Division
Sep 12, 2002
No. 5:02mcl (E.D. Tex. Sep. 12, 2002)

Opinion

No. 5:02mcl

September 12, 2002


MEMORANDUM ORDER


The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report of the Magistrate Judge which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action has been presented for consideration. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the dispositive portion of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 6) is GRANTED. The Court will decline to exercise "anomalous" jurisdiction over Petitioner's Federal Criminal Rule 41(e) Petition for Return of Property and Suppression of Evidence Seized Under Search Warrant Issued November 1, 2001 (Dkt. No. 1). It is further

ORDERED that Petitioner's above-entitled and numbered cause of action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Flores v. Goldsmith

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Texarkana Division
Sep 12, 2002
No. 5:02mcl (E.D. Tex. Sep. 12, 2002)
Case details for

Flores v. Goldsmith

Case Details

Full title:DR DENNIS R. FLORES, Plaintiff v. SUSAN GOLDSMITH and ALL AGENTS OF THE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Texarkana Division

Date published: Sep 12, 2002

Citations

No. 5:02mcl (E.D. Tex. Sep. 12, 2002)

Citing Cases

United States v. Travalino

(“The applicability of equitable principles is the same whether the present action is viewed as one brought…