Flores v. Doe

Full title: MAURICIO FLORES, Plaintiff, v. JANE DOE, et al., Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 22, 2012

12-CV-1290 (SJF)(WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 22, 2012)

Opinion

12-CV-1290 (SJF)(WDW)

03-22-2012

MAURICIO FLORES, Plaintiff, v. JANE DOE, et al., Defendant.

Sandra J. Feuerstein

ORDER

FEUERSTEIN, District Judge:

Pursuant to the Court's February 13, 2012 Order of Consolidation, the Court has reviewed the instant complaint and finds that it relates to the subject matter of the Consolidated Action, Anderson, et al. v. Sposato. et al., 11-CV-5663 (SJF)(WDW). Accordingly, this action shall proceed in accordance with the Order of Consolidation, a copy of which is annexed hereto.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedee v. United States. 369 U.S. 438.444-45. 82 S. Ct. 917. 8 L. Ed.2d 21 (1962).

The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order and the Order of Consolidation to the pro se plaintiff at his last known address.

SO ORDERED.

_________________

Sandra J. Feuerstein

United States District Judge.

Central Islip, New York