From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. Bank of Am., N.A.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 13, 2013
No. 60282 (Nev. Dec. 13, 2013)

Opinion

No. 60282

12-13-2013

ARNULFO FLORES; AND LETICIA FLORES, Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; AND FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCATION (FANNIE MAE), Respondents.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF REVERSAL AND REMAND

This is an appeal from a district court order denying a petition for judicial review in a Foreclosure Mediation Program (FMP) matter. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Patrick Flanagan, Judge.

After an unsuccessful mediation, appellants filed a petition for judicial review. Appellants argued that respondent Bank of America, N.A., the loan servicer for respondent Fannie Mae, failed to produce certified copies of the original note, deed of trust, and an assignment at the mediation. The district court agreed and imposed monetary sanctions on Bank of America. Nonetheless, the district court determined that, upon payment of the sanctions, an FMP certificate would issue. This appeal followed.

Appellants contend that the district court abused its discretion by concluding that an FMP certificate could issue after the sanctions were paid. We agree. See Holt v. Reg'l Tr. Servs. Corp., 127 Nev. ___, ___, 266 P.3d 602, 607 (2011) ("[D]enial of an FMP certificate follows automatically from a finding that the statutory FMP requirements have been shirked . . . . [A] district court abuses its discretion if it does not order the FMP certificate withheld for noncompliance with the FMP requirements." (citations omitted)); Leyva v. Nat'l Default Servicing Corp., 127 Nev. ___, ___, 255 P.3d 1275, 1276-77 (2011) ("Failure to [produce the required documents] is a sanctionable offense, and the district court is prohibited from allowing the foreclosure process to proceed.").

Accordingly, we reverse the district court's order denying appellants' petition for judicial review insofar as it permitted an FMP certificate to be issued, and we remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.

In light of our disposition, we need not address appellants' remaining arguments.

It is so ORDERED.

_________________, C.J.

Pickering

_________________, J.

Hardesty

_________________, J.

Cherry
cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge

Mark L. Mausert

Akerman Senterfitt/Las Vegas

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Flores v. Bank of Am., N.A.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 13, 2013
No. 60282 (Nev. Dec. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Flores v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Case Details

Full title:ARNULFO FLORES; AND LETICIA FLORES, Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 13, 2013

Citations

No. 60282 (Nev. Dec. 13, 2013)