From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. Babcock

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 11, 2013
2:13-cv-1130-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2013)

Opinion


JAIME DEL TORO FLORES, Petitioner, v. MIKE BABCOCK, Respondent. No. 2:13-cv-1130-CMK-P United States District Court, E.D. California. December 11, 2013

          ORDER

          CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has not, however, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the required filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to submit either a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. Petitioner is warned that failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action. See Local Rule 11-110.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit on the form provided by the Clerk of the Court, within 30 days from the date of this order, a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, or the appropriate filing fee; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.


Summaries of

Flores v. Babcock

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 11, 2013
2:13-cv-1130-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Flores v. Babcock

Case Details

Full title:JAIME DEL TORO FLORES, Petitioner, v. MIKE BABCOCK, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 11, 2013

Citations

2:13-cv-1130-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 11, 2013)