From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 27, 2008
No. 1:07-CV-01513 SMS (E.D. Cal. May. 27, 2008)

Opinion

No. 1:07-CV-01513 SMS.

May 27, 2008

BRIAN C. SHAPIRO, ATTORNEY AT LAW: 192789, LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING, SANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, Attorney for SABRINO FLORES.

McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney

DONNA MONTANO, Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant, [By fax authorization on May 16, 2008].


STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ORDER


The parties, through their undersigned counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE, subject to the approval of the Court, to a dismissal of the above-captioned matter, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which dismissal shall be with prejudice.

Each party shall bear his/her own costs and expenses, including but not limited to attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d).


IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, based on the stipulation by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that the court dismisses the above matter without prejudice. Each side to bear his/her own costs and expenses, including but not limited to attorney's fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Flores v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 27, 2008
No. 1:07-CV-01513 SMS (E.D. Cal. May. 27, 2008)
Case details for

Flores v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SABINO FLORES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 27, 2008

Citations

No. 1:07-CV-01513 SMS (E.D. Cal. May. 27, 2008)