Flores-Medina v. Kauffman

Full title: JOSE FLORES-MEDINA Petitioner, pro se v. KEVIN KAUFFMAN, et al. Respondents

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 7, 2022

Civil Action 20-5712 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 20-5712

10-07-2022

JOSE FLORES-MEDINA Petitioner, pro se v. KEVIN KAUFFMAN, et al. Respondents

NITZA I. QUINONES ALEJANDRO JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ORDER

NITZA I. QUINONES ALEJANDRO JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

AND NOW, this 7^th day of October 2022, upon consideration of Petitioner Jose Flores-Medina's (“Petitioner”) pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus, [ECF 1], Respondents' response in opposition, [ECF 10], the state court record, the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lloret, which recommended that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied in its entirety, [ECF 14], Petitioner's pro se objections, [ECF 18], and after conducting a de novo review of the objections, it is hereby ORDERED, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED, as modified consistent with the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion;

2. The objections to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED;

3. No evidentiary hearing is deemed necessary;

4. Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED;

5. No probable cause exists to issue a certificate of appealability; and

6. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter CLOSED.