From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flood v. State

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Aug 30, 2012
NO. 01-12-00379-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 01-12-00379-CR

08-30-2012

LARRY FLOOD, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1324677


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Larry Flood, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of failure to comply with sex offender registration requirements. The trial court found appellant guilty and, in accordance with the terms of appellant's plea agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to confinement for three years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

In a plea bargain case, a defendant may appeal only those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or after getting the trial court's permission to appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court's certification is included in the record on appeal. See id. The trial court's certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant did not appeal any pre-trial matters, and the trial court did not give permission for appellant to appeal. The record supports the trial court's certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) ("A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.").

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

Flood v. State

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Aug 30, 2012
NO. 01-12-00379-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Flood v. State

Case Details

Full title:LARRY FLOOD, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Aug 30, 2012

Citations

NO. 01-12-00379-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2012)