From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flood v. Graham

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9th & 10th Judicial Districts
Dec 15, 2014
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 93545 (N.Y. App. Term 2014)

Opinion

Motion No: 2014-00626 NC

12-15-2014

Maureen Flood, Respondent, v. Cathleen Graham and Fox Farm, Appellants.


ANGELA G. IANNACCI

JERRY GARGUILO, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by appellant for an enlargement of time to serve and file a reply brief on an appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Nassau County, Fourth District, entered March 21, 2014.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

ENTER:

Paul Kenny

Chief Clerk


Summaries of

Flood v. Graham

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9th & 10th Judicial Districts
Dec 15, 2014
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 93545 (N.Y. App. Term 2014)
Case details for

Flood v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:Maureen Flood, Respondent, v. Cathleen Graham and Fox Farm, Appellants.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9th & 10th Judicial Districts

Date published: Dec 15, 2014

Citations

2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 93545 (N.Y. App. Term 2014)

Citing Cases

R. H. Gore, et al., v. General Properties Corporation

Right of dower, inchoate or consummate, is an incumbrance. See Flood v. Graham, 61 Fla. 207, 54 So. 456, Ann.…

Skinner v. Scholes

The right in a certain named company to enjoy oil and asphalt rights for a period of ten years from a certain…