From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flomarcy Company v. Commr. of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 22, 1963
324 F.2d 730 (2d Cir. 1963)

Opinion

Nos. 29, 30, Dockets 27961, 27962.

Submitted November 6, 1963.

Decided November 22, 1963.

Samuel Zuckerman, New York City, for petitioners.

Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Melva M. Graney and Alec A. Pandaleon, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before WATERMAN, MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.


Flomarcy Company, Inc. and its controlling shareholders appeal from a decision of the Tax Court, T.C.Memo. 1962-201, upholding the assessment of deficiencies against the petitioners for failure to report income which the company had earned but which petitioners had caused to be paid to third parties. The taxpayers introduced no evidence, and it is well settled that deficiency assessments of the Commissioner are presumptively correct. Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115, 54 S.Ct. 8, 78 L.Ed. 212 (1933); Brown v. Commissioner, 141 F.2d 307, 309 (2 Cir. 1944). The argument made on this appeal that the government should have the burden of proof because a constructive dividend is a legal fiction is without legal or logical basis. The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Flomarcy Company v. Commr. of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 22, 1963
324 F.2d 730 (2d Cir. 1963)
Case details for

Flomarcy Company v. Commr. of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:FLOMARCY COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 22, 1963

Citations

324 F.2d 730 (2d Cir. 1963)

Citing Cases

United States v. Lease

Had Lease chosen to follow either of the more typical methods available for questioning his tax liability —…

Commissioner v. Riss

Such is also the rule in constructive dividend cases. Flomarcy Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 2…