From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flockhart Foundry Co. v. Cox Automatic Pipe Bending Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 19, 1924
96 N.J. Eq. 396 (N.J. 1924)

Opinion

Decided May 19th, 1924.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 95 N.J. Eq. 382.

Mr. Elmer W. Demarest, for the appellant.

Messrs. McCarter English, for the respondent.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS — 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Flockhart Foundry Co. v. Cox Automatic Pipe Bending Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 19, 1924
96 N.J. Eq. 396 (N.J. 1924)
Case details for

Flockhart Foundry Co. v. Cox Automatic Pipe Bending Co.

Case Details

Full title:FLOCKHART FOUNDRY COMPANY, respondent. v. COX AUTOMATIC PIPE BENDING…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 19, 1924

Citations

96 N.J. Eq. 396 (N.J. 1924)

Citing Cases

Lessler v. Paterson National Bank

A counter charge for discount was made. This point was, substantially, disposed of against the present…

Havens v. Mohme Aero Engineering Corp.

The distinguishing characteristic of the transaction here scrutinized is that the appellant's chattel…