Because, procedurally speaking, McCahill is identical to the case at bar, and because U.S. National Bank failed to acknowledge McCahill as binding precedent – much less give it the full weight of stare decisis – we adhere to the rule from McCahill and disregard U.S. National Bank as dicta . Thus, we agree with Mr. Barak, that the order at bar striking the lis pendens is final under McCahill and immediately appealable. A panel of this Court, also without analysis, followed the U.S. National Bank 's dicta in Flitter v. Chandor , 364 Pa.Super. 252, 527 A.2d 1050, 1051 (1987), and held "that an order lifting a lis pendens is nonappealable ...." That statement resulted in partial quashal of the appeal.