From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flitcroft v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 10, 2014
139 So. 3d 885 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC14–161.

2014-04-10

Michael FLITCROFT, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


Having determined that petitioner's pro se notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction is unauthorized, this case is hereby dismissed, subject to reinstatement if petitioner demonstrates within fifteen days from the date of this order that he was not represented by counsel in the proceedings below at the time he filed his notice in this Court. See Logan v. State, 846 So.2d 472 (Fla.2003).


Summaries of

Flitcroft v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 10, 2014
139 So. 3d 885 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Flitcroft v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael FLITCROFT, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Apr 10, 2014

Citations

139 So. 3d 885 (Fla. 2014)