From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flippin v. ChexSystems, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
May 13, 2020
Civil Action No. 19-3052 (BAH) (D.D.C. May. 13, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 19-3052 (BAH)

05-13-2020

AMEER FLIPPIN, Plaintiff, v. CHEXSYSTEMS, INC., Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff Ameer Flippin, appearing pro se, filed this action, under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., against defendant ChexSystems, Inc., which has filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), ECF No. 21. Plaintiff has filed no timely opposition. See Order (Dec. 19, 2019), ECF No. 23 (advising plaintiff to respond by January 30, 2020, and cautioning that defendant's unopposed arguments may be treated as conceded). For the reasons explained below, the motion is granted.

On November 15, 2019, plaintiff's complaint against the governmental defendants, see Case Caption, was dismissed pursuant to the screening provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). See Order, ECF No. 6. --------

On December 31, 2019, the foregoing order was returned to the Clerk as undelivered at plaintiff's address of record. See ECF No. 24. Therefore, the Court cannot find that the plaintiff has conceded defendant's motion. Review of the complaint, however, makes clear that the complaint lacks sufficient facts to state a plausible claim for relief. See generally Def.'s Mem.; cf. Wood v. Moss, 134 S.Ct. 2056, 2067 (2014) ("under the governing pleading standard, 'the complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.'") (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)). That said, defendant's request to dismiss the complaint "with prejudice," Mem. at 13, is denied because a dismissal with prejudice "is warranted only when a trial court determines that the allegation of other facts consistent with the challenged pleading could not possibly cure the deficiency." Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1209 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)). The circumstances of this case do not warrant such definitive relief.

A separate Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion will be filed contemporaneously.

/s/_________

CHIEF JUDGE DATE: May 13, 2020


Summaries of

Flippin v. ChexSystems, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
May 13, 2020
Civil Action No. 19-3052 (BAH) (D.D.C. May. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Flippin v. ChexSystems, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AMEER FLIPPIN, Plaintiff, v. CHEXSYSTEMS, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: May 13, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 19-3052 (BAH) (D.D.C. May. 13, 2020)