From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flinton v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 21, 2020
19 CIVIL 2054 (LGS)(DF) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 21, 2020)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 2054 (LGS)(DF)

09-21-2020

MOLLIE MARIE FLINTON, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated September 21, 2020, the Court finds no clear error on the face of the record. The Report and Recommendation is adopted. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED, Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED and the case is REMANDED to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

September 21, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Flinton v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 21, 2020
19 CIVIL 2054 (LGS)(DF) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 21, 2020)
Case details for

Flinton v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:MOLLIE MARIE FLINTON, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 21, 2020

Citations

19 CIVIL 2054 (LGS)(DF) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 21, 2020)

Citing Cases

Ortega v. The Matilda Gourmet Deli Inc.

WHEREAS, in reviewing a report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, a district judge “may accept,…

Maldonado v. Papadopoulos

WHEREAS, in reviewing a Report and Recommendation of a magistrate judge, a district judge “may accept,…