From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flinn v. Sexton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Jan 16, 2015
No.: 3:15-cv-16-PLR-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 16, 2015)

Opinion

No.: 3:15-cv-16-PLR-HBG

01-16-2015

JAMES M. FLINN, Petitioner, v. DAVID A. SEXTON, Warden, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve copies of the petition and this Memorandum and Order upon the respondent and the Attorney General for The State of Tennessee.

Since it does not plainly appear from the face of the petition that it should be summarily dismissed, the respondent is hereby ORDERED to answer or otherwise respond to the petition within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases In The United States District Courts. The respondent should specifically address whether the petition was timely filed and whether the petitioner has exhausted his available state court remedies. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(d), 2254(b).

ENTER:

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Flinn v. Sexton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Jan 16, 2015
No.: 3:15-cv-16-PLR-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Flinn v. Sexton

Case Details

Full title:JAMES M. FLINN, Petitioner, v. DAVID A. SEXTON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: Jan 16, 2015

Citations

No.: 3:15-cv-16-PLR-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 16, 2015)