From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flinches v. Rimington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 5, 2011
3:11-cv-00710-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Oct. 5, 2011)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00710-RCJ-WGC

10-05-2011

MARITTE FLINCHES, Plaintiff, v. RICK RIMINGTON, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a civil rights complaint. Neither a filing fee nor an application to proceed in forma pauperis was received with the complaint. The cover letter refers to a check, but no check was enclosed. It does not appear from the allegations presented that a promptly filed new action would be time-barred under the applicable two-year statute of limitations.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that this action shall be DISMISSED without prejudice to the filing of a new properly commenced action under a new docket number with either the required filing fee or a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis.

The Clerk shall send plaintiff two copies each of an in forma pauperis application form for a prisoner and a blank Section 1983 complaint form, along with the instructions for each form and a copy of the papers that he submitted.

The Clerk shall enter final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action without prejudice.

ROBERT C. JONES

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Flinches v. Rimington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 5, 2011
3:11-cv-00710-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Oct. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Flinches v. Rimington

Case Details

Full title:MARITTE FLINCHES, Plaintiff, v. RICK RIMINGTON, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

3:11-cv-00710-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Oct. 5, 2011)