From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fletcher v. Warden Sam Law

United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division
Dec 4, 2009
No. CV-09-73-GF-SEH (D. Mont. Dec. 4, 2009)

Opinion

No. CV-09-73-GF-SEH.

December 4, 2009


ORDER


On November 19, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered Findings and Recommendation in this matter. Plaintiff filed objections on December 2, 2009. The Court reviews de novo findings and recommendation to which objection is made.

Document No. 7

Upon de novo review of the record, I find no clear error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendation and adopt them in full.

ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.

2. The dismissal of the Complaint shall count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) as Plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

3. Any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith as the claims asserted clearly lack merit. Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(3)(A).

4. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Fletcher v. Warden Sam Law

United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division
Dec 4, 2009
No. CV-09-73-GF-SEH (D. Mont. Dec. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Fletcher v. Warden Sam Law

Case Details

Full title:PAUL HARTSON FLETCHER, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN SAM LAW, et. al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division

Date published: Dec 4, 2009

Citations

No. CV-09-73-GF-SEH (D. Mont. Dec. 4, 2009)