From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fletcher v. Village of Victor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

January, 1935.


Motion for a reargument denied, with ten dollars costs; motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Memorandum: The dismissal of the complaint after the coming in of the jury verdict for plaintiff was on the merits. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 482.) We found no evidence in the record of negligence in defendant upon which a verdict for plaintiff could be based. ( Bryant v. Village of Postsdam, 253 N.Y. 524.) Therefore, we affirmed the judgment as rendered, the plaintiff not having objected to the reservation of decision on the motion to dismiss the complaint and not having been prejudiced by the granting of the motion to dismiss after rather than before the jury rendered the general verdict. ( Glennon v. Erie Railroad Company, 86 App. Div. 397, 400; affd., 180 N.Y. 562.) (See, also, Gunn v. Lackawanna Steel Co., 177 App. Div. 277; affd., 226 N.Y. 651.) Order entered January 4, 1935.


Summaries of

Fletcher v. Village of Victor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Fletcher v. Village of Victor

Case Details

Full title:MABEL SMITH FLETCHER, Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF VICTOR, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1935

Citations

243 App. Div. 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)