From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fletcher v. Reed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Mar 30, 2016
Case: 1:16-cv-00619 (D.D.C. Mar. 30, 2016)

Opinion

Case: 1:16-cv-00619

03-30-2016

DEBORAH DIANE FLETCHER, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHERE REED (SUPERMAN), Defendant.


Assigned To : Unassigned
Assign. Date : 4/1/2016
Description: Pro Se Gen. Civ. MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court has the discretion to decide whether a complaint is frivolous, and such finding is appropriate when the facts alleged are irrational or wholly incredible. Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992); see Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) ("[A] complaint, containing as it does both factual allegations and legal conclusions, is frivolous where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact."). Having reviewed the plaintiff's complaint, the Court concludes that what factual contentions are identifiable are baseless and wholly incredible. Furthermore, the allegations of the complaint "constitute the sort of patently insubstantial claims" that deprive the Court of subject matter jurisdiction. Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1010 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

The Court will grant plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, and dismiss the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. DATE: 3/30/16

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Fletcher v. Reed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Mar 30, 2016
Case: 1:16-cv-00619 (D.D.C. Mar. 30, 2016)
Case details for

Fletcher v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH DIANE FLETCHER, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHERE REED (SUPERMAN)…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Mar 30, 2016

Citations

Case: 1:16-cv-00619 (D.D.C. Mar. 30, 2016)