Opinion
20-35647
07-28-2021
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Submitted July 19, 2021.[**]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho D.C. No. 1:14-cv-00532-BLW, B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding.
Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM [*]
Former Idaho state prisoner William Jermaine Fletcher appeals pro se from the district court's orders denying his post-judgment motions to reopen his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging inadequate dental care. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the denial of a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Fletcher's post-judgment motions to reopen because Fletcher failed to establish any grounds for relief. See id. at 1262-63 (setting forth factors for reconsideration and relief from judgment under Rule 60(b)).
AFFIRMED. [*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. [**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).