From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fletcher v. Corizon Health, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 28, 2021
No. 20-35647 (9th Cir. Jul. 28, 2021)

Opinion

20-35647

07-28-2021

WILLIAM JERMAINE FLETCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC., and employees; et al., Defendants-Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Submitted July 19, 2021.[**]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho D.C. No. 1:14-cv-00532-BLW, B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM [*]

Former Idaho state prisoner William Jermaine Fletcher appeals pro se from the district court's orders denying his post-judgment motions to reopen his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging inadequate dental care. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the denial of a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Fletcher's post-judgment motions to reopen because Fletcher failed to establish any grounds for relief. See id. at 1262-63 (setting forth factors for reconsideration and relief from judgment under Rule 60(b)).

AFFIRMED. [*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. [**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).


Summaries of

Fletcher v. Corizon Health, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 28, 2021
No. 20-35647 (9th Cir. Jul. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Fletcher v. Corizon Health, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM JERMAINE FLETCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 28, 2021

Citations

No. 20-35647 (9th Cir. Jul. 28, 2021)