From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fleming v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Nov 7, 2018
258 So. 3d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. 3D18-1647

11-07-2018

Janis FLEMING, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Law Offices of Grey and Mourin, and Jason Grey and Lana Cucchiella, for petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Marlon J. Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.


Law Offices of Grey and Mourin, and Jason Grey and Lana Cucchiella, for petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Marlon J. Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court properly decided the other issues on review, the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law when it ruled it was legally barred from viewing the videotape of the altercation at the heart of this matter, as the State commendably concedes. Precisely because the county court expressly based its factual finding on a determination that the videotape contradicted the testimony of the defendant, the circuit court should have included a review of the videotape in deciding whether the county court's fact finding was supported by any competent substantial evidence.

Petition granted.


Summaries of

Fleming v. State

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Nov 7, 2018
258 So. 3d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Fleming v. State

Case Details

Full title:Janis Fleming, Petitioner, v. The State of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Nov 7, 2018

Citations

258 So. 3d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)