From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fleming v. Oppel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 2, 1938
254 App. Div. 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Summary

In Fleming v. Oppel, 1938, 254 App. Div. 740, 3 N.Y.S.2d 971, a landlord was held not liable, as a matter of law, for bodily injuries sustained by a tenant in a multiple dwelling when her hand struck a defective washtub cover therein.

Summary of this case from Lake v. Emigh

Opinion

May 2, 1938.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ. [ 163 Misc. 876.]


In an action by a wife to recover damages for injuries sustained when her hand struck a defective washtub cover, and by her husband for loss of services and medical expenses, order of the Appellate Term reversing a judgment for plaintiffs, entered on a jury verdict rendered in the City Court of the City of New York, County of Queens, and dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. (See Kitchen v. Landy, 215 App. Div. 586; Liddell v. Novak, 246 id. 848, and Bibeault v. Hefgold Realty Corp., 250 id. 761.)


Summaries of

Fleming v. Oppel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 2, 1938
254 App. Div. 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

In Fleming v. Oppel, 1938, 254 App. Div. 740, 3 N.Y.S.2d 971, a landlord was held not liable, as a matter of law, for bodily injuries sustained by a tenant in a multiple dwelling when her hand struck a defective washtub cover therein.

Summary of this case from Lake v. Emigh
Case details for

Fleming v. Oppel

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE FLEMING and GLADYS FLEMING, Appellants, v. ELIZABETH OPPEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 2, 1938

Citations

254 App. Div. 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Citing Cases

Sawchuk v. Santemma

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as a consequence of a fall in a shower bath when a…

Ritto v. Goldberg

The submission to the jury of liability of the landlord solely on the basis of the statutory provisions was…