From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fleming v. Long Island Railroad

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 16, 1983
59 N.Y.2d 895 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Argued June 1, 1983

Decided June 16, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, ALBERT H. BUSCHMANN, J.

James L. Fischer, Thomas W. Hyland and John W. Manning for appellants.

Mitchell Kaufman and Seymour H. Metnick for respondent.



Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative ( Andersen v Long Is. R.R., 59 N.Y.2d 657). We add only that because the demand provided for in subdivision 1 of section 1276 of the Public Authorities Law is a condition to consent of the State and the passage of 30 days since the demand is required to be alleged in the complaint, the lack of such a demand is not a matter required by CPLR 3018 (subd [b]) to be pleaded a an affirmative defense.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS.


Summaries of

Fleming v. Long Island Railroad

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 16, 1983
59 N.Y.2d 895 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Fleming v. Long Island Railroad

Case Details

Full title:MARK FLEMING et al., Appellants, v. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 16, 1983

Citations

59 N.Y.2d 895 (N.Y. 1983)
465 N.Y.S.2d 938
452 N.E.2d 1266

Citing Cases

Singer v. Liberty Lines

on the County's part to indemnify the defendant Liberty Lines for any damages recovered against it (General…

Nicholas v. City of New York

We disagree. Compliance with the notice of claim provisions of General Municipal Law § 50-e is a condition…