From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fleetwood Servs. v. Ram Capital Funding, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 16, 2022
20-cv-5120 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 16, 2022)

Opinion

20-cv-5120 (LJL)

09-16-2022

FLEETWOOD SERVICES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. RAM CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC, TSVI REICH a/k/a STEVE REICH, RICHMOND CAPITAL GROUP LLC n/k/a RCG ADVANCES LLC, and ROBERT GIARDINA, Defendants.


ORDER

LEWIS J. LIMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On August 31, 2022, counsel for defendants Robert Giardina and Richmond Capital Group filed a letter on the docket seeking a stay of execution of the judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff “until the time the appealable issues can be briefed and heard by the [S]econd [C]ircuit” and requesting that the Court “hold any motion for attorney[s'] fees in abeyance, until the time that the Second Circuit render[s] its decision.” Dkt. No. 108 at 2. The letter states that it is a letter motion, but it was filed on the docket as “NOTICE of Rule 68.” Plaintiff has not filed a response to the letter.

It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to the letter filed at Dkt. No. 108 no later than September 23, 2022. Giardina and Richmond Capital Group may file a reply in further support of their requests by September 27, 2022.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fleetwood Servs. v. Ram Capital Funding, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 16, 2022
20-cv-5120 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Fleetwood Servs. v. Ram Capital Funding, LLC

Case Details

Full title:FLEETWOOD SERVICES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. RAM CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC, TSVI…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 16, 2022

Citations

20-cv-5120 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 16, 2022)