From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fleet v. Cronin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1896
5 App. Div. 48 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)

Opinion

May Term, 1896.

I. Newton Williams, for the appellant.

L.A. Gould, for the respondent.

Present — VAN BRUNT, P.J., BARRETT, RUMSEY, O'BRIEN and INGRAHAM, JJ.


This motion was made after issue joined to obtain a discovery and inspection for use by the plaintiff upon the trial. After the motion was noticed an amended complaint was served, to which it does not appear that any answer has been interposed. As the service of an amended complaint destroys the issues raised by the original pleadings, and as the defendant has not joined issue upon the amended complaint by serving an answer, the motion should have been denied, it having been many times held that, until the cause is at issue, the application for discovery of books and papers for use upon the trial is premature.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, but with leave to plaintiff after issue joined to renew the motion.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, but with leave to plaintiff to renew motion after issue joined.


Summaries of

Fleet v. Cronin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1896
5 App. Div. 48 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
Case details for

Fleet v. Cronin

Case Details

Full title:IRENE A. FLEET, Respondent, v . HELEN M. CRONIN, as Executrix, etc., of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 1896

Citations

5 App. Div. 48 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
40 N.Y.S. 66