From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fleck v. Wetch

Supreme Court of the United States
Dec 3, 2018
139 S. Ct. 590 (2018)

Summary

remanding a mandatory bar membership case for further consideration in light of Janus

Summary of this case from Crowe v. Or. State Bar, Corp.

Opinion

No. 17–886.

12-03-2018

Arnold FLECK, petitioner, v. Joe WETCH, et al.


Motion of Pacific Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of Kourosh Kenneth Hamidi, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of Janus v. State, County, and Municipal Employees, 585 U.S. ––––, 138 S.Ct. 2448, 201 L.Ed.2d 924 (2018).


Summaries of

Fleck v. Wetch

Supreme Court of the United States
Dec 3, 2018
139 S. Ct. 590 (2018)

remanding a mandatory bar membership case for further consideration in light of Janus

Summary of this case from Crowe v. Or. State Bar, Corp.
Case details for

Fleck v. Wetch

Case Details

Full title:Arnold FLECK, petitioner, v. Joe WETCH, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Dec 3, 2018

Citations

139 S. Ct. 590 (2018)
202 L. Ed. 2d 423

Citing Cases

File v. Kastner

Thus, Harris cannot be understood as a narrowing of Keller. Second, the plaintiff contends that because, in…

Crowe v. Or. State Bar, Corp.

To begin, the district court will need to determine whether Janus supplies the appropriate standard for…