From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flechtner v. Board of Education of Hoboken

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 27, 1934
174 A. 529 (N.J. 1934)

Opinion

Argued May 23, 1934 —

Decided September 27, 1934.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 12 N.J. Mis. R. 345.

For the defendant-respondent and prosecutor-appellant, Board of Education of District of Hoboken, Joseph Greenberg.

For the prosecutrices-appellants and defendants-respondents Angelina Koch Downs and Rai Driesen Flechtner, Arthur T. Vanderbilt.


The judgments under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Flechtner v. Board of Education of Hoboken

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 27, 1934
174 A. 529 (N.J. 1934)
Case details for

Flechtner v. Board of Education of Hoboken

Case Details

Full title:RAI DRIESEN FLECHTNER, PROSECUTRIX-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 27, 1934

Citations

174 A. 529 (N.J. 1934)
174 A. 529

Citing Cases

Nichols v. Jersey City Bd. of Education

As Justice Heher pointed out in the later Downs case, at 126 N.J.L., p. 12, the observation in the earlier…

Zimmerman v. Board of Education of Newark

Today, the powers of a board of education in appointment, transfer or dismissal are not so broad. They are…