Opinion
2021-03548 2020-01082
06-08-2021
William Flecha, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roberto Neira, Defendant-Respondent. Index No. 22834/17E Appeal No. 14021N
Michael Manoussos & Co PLLC, Kew Gardens (Jorge Rivera of counsel), for appellant. Alan B. Brill, P.C., New City (Veronica A. McMillan of counsel), for respondent.
Michael Manoussos & Co PLLC, Kew Gardens (Jorge Rivera of counsel), for appellant.
Alan B. Brill, P.C., New City (Veronica A. McMillan of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Renwick, J.P., Kern, Scarpulla, Mendez, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered September 12, 2019, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff's motion to vacate a May 3, 2019 order dismissing the action for failure to comply with a prior order of January 11, 2019 conditionally dismissing the complaint upon failure to file a note of issue by February 28, 2019, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the order of dismissal vacated.
The conditional order of dismissal directing plaintiff to file a note of issue by February 28, 2019 or the action would be dismissed failed to adhere to the statutory procedure for dismissing an action for failure to file a note of issue. Specifically, the conditional order of dismissal failed to provide plaintiff with the requisite 90 days to file a note of issue, failed to specify the conduct constituting the neglect demonstrating a general pattern of delay, and did not constitute the requisite written notice because it was not signed by the parties (see CPLR 3216[a], [b][3]; Board of Mgrs. of the Lore Condominium v Gaetano, 139 A.D.3d 550 [1st Dept 2016]; Goetz v Public Serv. Truck Renting, Inc., 162 A.D.3d 859, 860-861 [2d Dept 2018]). The compliance conference order dated November 1, 2018 suffers from the same infirmities as the February 28, 2019 order.