From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flaunders v. Asuncion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 1, 2020
CASE NO. CV 18-211-JLS (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 18-211-JLS (PJW)

07-01-2020

JOSEPH FLAUNDERS, Petitioner, v. DEBORAH ASUNCION, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the Report and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that the court erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). DATED: July 1, 2020

/s/_________

HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Flaunders v. Asuncion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 1, 2020
CASE NO. CV 18-211-JLS (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2020)
Case details for

Flaunders v. Asuncion

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH FLAUNDERS, Petitioner, v. DEBORAH ASUNCION, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 1, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. CV 18-211-JLS (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2020)