From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flato Bros. v. Mckinney

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi
Feb 24, 1966
399 S.W.2d 957 (Tex. Civ. App. 1966)

Opinion

No. 194.

February 24, 1966.

Appeal from the 94th District Court, Nueces County, Tillman Smith, J.

Auforth Bonniwell, by Charles A. Bonniwell, Corpus Christi, for appellant.

No brief filed or appearance for appellee.


Appellant attempts to appeal from an order signed by the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, setting aside a default judgment theretofore rendered by the court in this cause, and granting a new trial. Since such order is interlocutory, and not a final judgment, this Court is without power to review it. Lynn v. Hanna, 116 Tex. 652, 296 S.W. 280; McCauley v. Consolidated Underwriters, 157 Tex. 475, 304 S.W.2d 265; Palmer v. D.O.K.K. Benevolent and Insurance Ass'n, 160 Tex. 513, 334 S.W.2d 149; Stocks v. Baptist General Convention of Texas, Tex.Civ.App., 362 S.W.2d 196; Appellate Procedure in Texas, § 2.5. See also Spikes v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 386 S.W.2d 346.

Appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the motion for new trial, and that, notwithstanding the interlocutory nature of the order, this Court has the power on this appeal to pass on such question of abuse of discretion. This would necessarily require a consideration of the merits of the appeal. Since we have no jurisdiction over this attempted appeal, any consideration of the issue raised by appellant would constitute fundamental error on our part. McCauley v. Consolidated Underwriters, supra.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Flato Bros. v. Mckinney

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi
Feb 24, 1966
399 S.W.2d 957 (Tex. Civ. App. 1966)
Case details for

Flato Bros. v. Mckinney

Case Details

Full title:FLATO BROTHERS, INC., Appellant, v. James A. McKINNEY, Appellee

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi

Date published: Feb 24, 1966

Citations

399 S.W.2d 957 (Tex. Civ. App. 1966)

Citing Cases

Usher v. Bonner

Since there was no severance of plaintiff's suit as to these appellees we construe the court's order to have…

Neunhoffer v. State

ation in Rule 326, supra, to the effect that not more than two new trials shall be granted either party…